Template Letter for MPS - including cats in proposed Pet Abduction Offence

-



Your address here
(NB must be included for your
MP to respond to your
correspondence)

Your MP’s name
House of Commons
London
SW1A 0AA

Date

Dear  Name of your MP

Including Family Cats in the Proposed Pet Abduction Offence in the Animal Welfare (Kept Animals) Bill

I am writing to you as my constituency MP to express my disappointment at the Government’s decision to limit the new Pet Abduction Offence in the Animal Welfare (Kept Animals) Bill to dogs and to ask you to make representations to relevant ministers to reconsider their position with regard to the inclusion of our family cats.

As you are aware, in May 2021 in response to growing public concern about the rise in reported pet theft since the start of the pandemic, the government established a Pet Theft Taskforce to investigate and to recommend any necessary measures to tackle the problem. After taking expert evidence from individuals and welfare organisations, albeit almost exclusively in respect of dogs, the Taskforce published its report in September. Its key conclusion was that “The Taskforce does not believe that the creation of a new Pet Theft Offence or a statutory aggravating factor—in line with recent campaigns—would have the desired impact. This is because theft deals with the deprivation of property, and so the welfare of the stolen animal would not be a primary consideration when sentencing. However, a new ‘Pet Abduction Offence’ could switch the focus from the loss to the owner to the welfare of the animal”. In other words, instead of seeking changes to the Theft Act 1968, which deals primarily with the theft of inanimate objects, it recommended including the proposed offence as part of the Animal Welfare (Kept Animals) Bill in recognition of the suffering inflicted on a sentient animal. 

Disappointingly, despite the fact that the Taskforce’s recommendations were written unambiguously with respect to all pets, the Government has decided that the proposed offence should, in the first instance, be limited solely to dogs. I recognise that there is provision in the Bill to include other species of companion animal at some unspecified future date, but the mechanism for achieving this is cumbersome and likely to prove extremely protracted. More importantly, the criteria for triggering these ‘enabling powers’ are already fully satisfied as regards our family cats—they are kept as pets, are capable of forming bonds with their owners and their removal would adversely affect their well-being. Instead, the decision seems to have been based on nothing more than the often-cited statistic that seven out of 10 pet thefts involve dogs. However, this figure relates solely to the Metropolitan Police area and simply represents the total for the last 10 years as a whole. As such it says nothing about the relative trends in pet theft over time. In fact, the number of thefts involving dogs as a percentage of total pet theft crimes has been on a firmly downward trend since 2018 and now comprises less than six out of 10. By contrast, the proportion involving cats has been on an almost continuous, steeply upwards trajectory, such that in 2021 they represented almost one third of all pet theft crimes. And nationwide, according to The Cat Theft Report 2022, the number of police recorded cat thefts in 2021 increased by a staggering 40%.  

However, this shouldn’t be an issue that is determined on the basis of statistics but by the fact that these animals are sentient beings as recognised by the Government. When it comes to their ability to suffer when taken away from home and family, it is not possible to differentiate between a dog and a cat regardless of the relative proportions of those stolen. 

By not including cats from the outset, they will remain trapped within the limitations of the Theft Act 1968 as property and therefore afforded no more protection from being stolen than an inanimate object and without their sentience fully recognised. Moreover, without the same inherent protection and deterrents afforded to dogs it is not unreasonable to conclude that the relative attractiveness of stealing family felines can only increase further; cat theft will remain a low risk, high reward proposition for thieves.

With the Bill having about to reach the Report Stage in the House of Commons there is still time to table an amendment to include cats alongside dogs in the proposed Pet Abduction offence. Can we please count on you either to support such an amendment or to table one yourself? Could we also ask you to write to the Rt Hon Ranil Jayawardena MP, Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, urging the Government to include cats in the proposed legislation from the outset. If it is more convenient, please feel free to forward this email to the Minister. 

I look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience.

Yours sincerely


Your Name


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Cat Theft Report 2022 - The Summary

-
Image
 The Summary “Stealing pets is evil and depraved. It brings profound unhappiness. It cannot and will not be tolerated”. Rt Hon Priti Patel MP, Home Secretary Contents Preface Main Findings Pet Abduction Offence Is Cat Theft Being Afforded Sufficient Priority by Our Police? Recorded Cat Thefts by Police Authority Prosecutions and Cautions Cat Breeds being Targeted Preface Pet Theft Awareness is an organisation dedicated to highlighting the growing threat of pet abduction within the public and parliamentary consciousness. Originally founded in 2013 by Richard Jordan and Arnot Wilson, they were subsequently joined by Toni Clarke following the theft of her much-loved Siamese cat, Clooney, when it became apparent there was a lack of official recognition of the theft of family cats by those in authority. The Cat Theft Report 2022 is the result of evidence-based research using data gathered year-on-year under a Freedom of Information request to all UK police forces. It spans the period 20...
Read more

Police, Pets, and Microchip Scanners.

-
Image
How many pet microchip scanners do the UK Police own? With almost ten million dogs in the UK required to have microchips - and the possibility of compulsory cat microchipping - we contacted all the UK constabularies to see if they have enough scanners to deal with the current laws that go with dog and horse compulsory microchipping? This report is not a criticism of the police but more a critical look at how their service could be improved with some funding and training.The foi was requested in July 2019 and the figures returned between then and the end of the year. Before we get into the figures let's talk briefly about microchips and scanners and databases: All pets and animals (except insects of course) can have a chip inserted. Dogs and cats will have them implanted above their shoulders below their neck. Reptiles have their chip in their rear left leg. Valuable carp fish are microchipped and so are parrots. Dogs must legally be chipped with correct ownership de...
Read more

Cat Theft Report 2021

-
Image
VISIT THE 2022 CAT THEFT REPORT (ARCHIVED PAGE) The 2021 UK Cat Theft Report: In a year of soaring dog thefts during lockdown, we are asking the question: Are our family cats a target too? With the public, media and police quite understandably focusing their attention on the burgeoning rise of dogs being stolen - we have all seen the shocking headlines during the Covid pandemic - has this created the opportunity for cat theft to become an increasingly invisible crime?  Pet theft is NOT yet a specific crime despite several government petitions leading to parliamentary debates. Gathering data on cat theft is proving to be increasingly difficult due to the disparate nature of recording crime statistics across the forces, but perversely, had we requested data on bicycles, scrap metal or even wild mushroom theft, we would be working with a full return of figures as all three have their own categories under the Theft Act 1968. It's scandalous that the law attaches more value to these ina...
Read more